The shell auto-image now runs code and turns the output into an image
that is embedded into the document
The prompt is configurable in /bin/prompt
The first draft is done up until the references section
The build system will generate certain types of graphics for the presentation as part of the build system. The resultant files will always go in the `auto-images` folder. As a result, this folder is not under version control.
\tikzstyle{commit} = [circle, text centered, line width=2, minimum size=1.5cm, draw=blue, fill=blue!80, text=white]
\tikzstyle{branch} = [ellipse, text centered, text=green]
\tikzstyle{arrow} = [thick, <-, draw=blue]
\usepackage{dirtree}
\usepackage{csquotes}
%\usepackage{gitdags}
@ -96,35 +106,6 @@
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Let's avoid this}
\dirtree{%
.1 Project.
.2 draft.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 final-draft.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 final.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 real-final.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 actual-real-final.
.3 some.
.3 files.
}
\note{%
I think, being honest, we have all done this. This sort of works, if you're working on something by yourself. Once you start collaborating on software, you are going to have a bad time.
However, this is a simple approach and not a million miles from what Git does internally.
I want this to be quite interactive so first things first, let's get Git setup.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Install}
@ -176,6 +157,9 @@
\textbf{Pick One}
\begin{minted}{bash}
# Set editor to vim
git config --global core.editor "vim"
# Set editor to nano
git config --global core.editor "nano"
@ -194,12 +178,191 @@
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Create a repository}
\frametitle{Setting It Up}
\framesubtitle{Preferences}
\textbf{Pick One}
\begin{minted}{bash}
mkdir Project
cd Project
git init
# No colour
git config --global color.ui never
# Auto colour
git config --global color.ui auto
# Force colour
git config --global color.ui always
# Overide for a command
git -c color.ui=always status > ~/some-file
\end{minted}
\note{%
On Linux systems, this is set to auto by default. Might be different on a Mac. Generally auto is probably what you want. It will be coloured unless you are piping the output to a file or another process.
Take note of the incorrect spelling of colour.
You can override all configuration options on an individual command basis if you like.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Terminology}
\framesubtitle{Objects}
\textbf{Blob} In Git, a file is called a blob.
\textbf{Tree} In Git, a directory is called a tree.
\textbf{Commit} A snapshot of your code
All of these are referenced by a hash and stored in the \mintinline{bash}{.git/objects/} directory.
\note{%
Most Git tutorials I have come across focus on memorizing commands. This way, the commands feel like magic and there is never really any understanding of what the commands do under the hood.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Naïve Approach}
\dirtree{%
.1 Project.
.2 draft.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 final-draft.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 final.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 real-final.
.3 some.
.3 files.
.2 actual-real-final.
.3 some.
.3 files.
}
\note{%
I think, being honest, we have all done this. This sort of works, if you're working on something by yourself. Once you start collaborating on software, you are going to have a bad time.
However, this is a simple approach and not a million miles from what Git does internally.
I want this to be quite interactive so first things first, let's get Git setup.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Model it}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
%\draw (-1.5,-1.5) rectangle (7.5,1.5);
%\node at (-2.5,0) {master};
\node[commit,minimum size=2cm] at (0,0) (commit1) {Draft};
\node[commit,minimum size=2cm] at (3,0) (commit2) {Final Draft};
\node[commit,minimum size=2cm] at (6,0) (commit3) {Final};
\draw[arrow] (commit1) -- (commit2);
\draw[arrow] (commit2) -- (commit3);
\node[draw,text width=1.8cm,anchor=north,align=center] at (0, -1.5) {\small \vdots\\[0.1cm] };
\node[draw,text width=1.8cm,anchor=north,align=center] at (3, -1.5) {\small \vdots\\[0.1cm] Draft };
\node[draw,text width=1.8cm,anchor=north,align=center] at (6, -1.5) {\small \vdots\\[0.1cm] Final Draft };
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\note{%
\begin{itemize}
\item This is a simple representation of the folder structure we saw, although for simplicity, I'm only showing 3 revisions.
\item Notice that so the computer knows the order, somewhere in each "snapshot", we include a reference to the previous snapshot
\end{itemize}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Commits}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
%\draw (-1.5,-1.5) rectangle (7.5,1.5);
%\node at (-2.5,0) {master};
\node[commit] at (0,0) (commit1) {93e4d3d\ldots};
\node[commit] at (3,0) (commit2) {2557962\ldots};
\node[commit] at (6,0) (commit3) {od68560\ldots};
\draw[arrow] (commit1) -- (commit2);
\draw[arrow] (commit2) -- (commit3);
\node[draw,text width=1.8cm,anchor=north,align=center] at (0, -1.5) {\small \vdots\\[0.1cm] };
\node[draw,text width=1.8cm,anchor=north,align=center] at (3, -1.5) {\small \vdots\\[0.1cm] 93e4d3d\ldots };
\node[draw,text width=1.8cm,anchor=north,align=center] at (6, -1.5) {\small \vdots\\[0.1cm] 2557962\ldots };
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\note{%
\begin{itemize}
\item Rather than human readable names, Git references each snapshot (called a commit) by a cryptographic hash. Currently using a hardened sha1 but there is an effort to move to sha256.
\item Similarly to the model above, each commit references the previous (except the first obviously)
\item The commit also includes meta information such as the committer, a timestamp and a message.
\item We will look at this in more detail a bit later.
\end{itemize}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Commits / Branches}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
%\draw (-1.5,-1.5) rectangle (7.5,1.5);
%\node at (-2.5,0) {master};
\node[commit] at (0,0) (commit1) {};
\node[commit] at (2,0) (commit2) {A};
\node[commit] at (4,0) (commit3) {B};
\node[commit] at (4,-2) (commit3b) {C};
\draw[arrow] (commit1) -- (commit2);
\draw[arrow] (commit2) -- (commit3);
\draw[arrow] (commit2) -- (commit3b);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\note{%
The linear graph we just saw is an overly simplistic representation. In reality, Git represents history using a Directed acyclic graph which allows parents to be shared my multiple commits. This is useful because it allows for Branches. We will look at these a bit more later.
It is good practice to develop features on a separate branch. This allows for multiple people to work on a project as well as allowing things like bug-fixes to be deployed without having to worry about interference from a new feature.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Commits / Branches}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
%\draw (-1.5,-1.5) rectangle (7.5,1.5);
%\node at (-2.5,0) {master};
\node[commit] at (0,0) (commit1) {};
\node[commit] at (2,0) (commit2) {};
\node[commit] at (5,0) (commit4) {A};
\node[commit] at (8,0) (commit5) {C};
\node[commit] at (4,-2) (commit3b) {};
\node[commit] at (6,-2) (commit4b) {B};
\draw[arrow] (commit1) -- (commit2);
\draw[arrow] (commit2) -- (commit4);
\draw[arrow] (commit4) -- (commit5);
\draw[arrow] (commit2) -- (commit3b);
\draw[arrow] (commit3b) -- (commit4b);
\draw[arrow] (commit4b) -- (commit5);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\note{%
As well as 2 commits' ability to share a parent, the opposite is also true, Here, we see that a commit is able to have multiple parents.
This is called a merge commit - because it merges two branches. In a lot of situations git is smart enough to auto-merge branches although at times human intervention is necessary.
By default, git creates a branch called Master when you create a repository.
Create repo and create a file called greeting.py. Make sure to mark it as executable.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Staging Area}
\begin{minted}{bash}
git status
# Add files / or directories
git add <file|directory> [<file|directory>...]
# Add everything not in gitignore
git add -A
\end{minted}
\note{%
The staging area is where you put things that you want to be committed.
It can often be useful to manually split changes up into different commits. You might be working on feature A and feature B simultaneously. It is good practice to have each feature as a separate commit so you could add feature A to the staging area, commit it, then do the same for feature B.
We will talk about \mintinline{bash}{.gitignore} in a bit.
Here can use git status to see what is in the staging area. They are listed in the "Changes to be committed" section. By default, they will also be green if you have colour switched on.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Committing}
\begin{minted}{bash}
git commit
\end{minted}
\begin{itemize}
\item First line should be concise summary around 50 chars
\item Body Should be wrapped to around 70 chars
\item There should be an empty line separating summary from body
\item If contributing to a project, check per-project guidelines
\begin{itemize}
\item Normally in contributing.md or similar
\end{itemize}
\item Use the imperative: "Fix bug" and not "Fixed bug" or "Fixes bug."
\end{itemize}
\note{%
First line is often shown by various tools
70 chars allows for good email etiquette. Allowing for 80 char hard wrap with after a few reply indents
Generally you will want to write in imperative as this is what automatic commits like merge do.
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Terminology}
\frametitle{When should you commit?}
\framesubtitle{Commit early, commit often}
\begin{itemize}
\item Every time you complete a small change or fix a bug
\item You don't normally want to commit broken code (intentionally at least)
\item In some instances you might want to auto-commit - but probably not too often.
\begin{itemize}
\item Normally this works if changes can't break something. E.g. Password Manager
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\note{%
Unfortunately, this doesn't have one simple answer.
\textbf{Blob} In Git, a file is called a blob.
Some examples of auto-committing are for your password manager.
}
\end{frame}
\textbf{Tree} In Git, a directory is called a tree.
Jonathan Hodgson
4 years ago